Lee > > On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02: > > > Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs? > > > > I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short > > test with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ... i didn't > > see anything like you observed. The memory consumption was > > quite stable after a few minutes. (This was with ATC turned > > off.) > > > > m. > > Tried fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo and had no problems. > Went back to the a/c I was testing and just let it sit there > while doing nothing but reduce the sound volume - no problem. > > I then closed the canopy (nasal), which resulted in a slight > increase of fgfs vm utilisation but after waiting for a minute > or two it was stable. I then revealed the 2D panel and that's > when the vm utilisation for fgfs started to ramp up (I ssh'd in > from another m/c and ran top to watch this). > > I switched back to the ufo and when I revealed the 2D panel > (C-172 default) fgfs vm utilisation seemed to start ramping, > although a lot more slowly than the a/c I was testing, so it > looks as though it may be something to do with the 2D panel, > which is a bit strange. > > As I said, the rate seems quite a bit lower with the ufo - I had > to wait about a minute or so before it was apparent that fgfs's > vm utilisation was ramping and it was only grabbing an extra mb > every 30 seconds or so. > > Do you see this? >
I just left the KC135 running airborne - it chewed up VM and finally froze. 2D panel as well. I'm not clear if this is the same phenomenon that you are seeing, or if the 2D panel is significant. Vivian _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
