On Monday 06 November 2006 13:17, Martin Spott wrote: > "Vivian Meazza" wrote: > > Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and a > > _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have > > won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones. > > Hey, guys, you're talking about a _development_ source code tree, don't > forget about this!! It's funny to realize that people got used to have > such a consistent and stable development tree that they already see the > whole project at risk just because _real_ development is currently > taking place :-) > > Mathias did a huge task to make the switch over to OSG actually happen. > Apparently the next item on the TODO list is to remove the glitches of > the port and do some fine tuning, afterwards to remove the dirty hacks > that had been implemented in the PLIB version - and which are still > present - and add them as a 'clean' solution to the OSG version. > > Don't feel to be looking at the dark side of the moon just because > your field-glasses got dirty ;-)
Thanks! Mathias ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
