Citing myself ....

Martin Spott wrote:

> According to my memory people didn't fall in love with the proposed
> patch because it attempted to set lightning stuff outside the
> scenegraph. This results in much higher cost of performance and
> maintainability !! compared to a clean solution inside the scenegraph,

I have to admit that the landing-light screeenshot with the AN-2 indeed
looks terribly nice, very desirable.
On the other hand we should not forget that Mathias, during his port to
OSG, is currently working on collecting old crufty scenegraph
workarounds together, trying to put this into a clean shape. It's
probably better to wait until a clean solution for landing lights is
available instead of putting even more cruft on the pile,

        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to