В сообщении от 9 Ноябрь 2006 18:24 Martin Spott написал(a): > According to my memory people didn't fall in love with the proposed > patch because it attempted to set lightning stuff outside the > scenegraph. This results in much higher cost of performance and > maintainability !! compared to a clean solution inside the scenegraph,
I'm not so familiary with code of FG, and I really did not known about this way. May be, I should ask to devel list before write code... . When I want to rewrite code and put lights to scenegraph, devel community begin migration to OSG. I decide wait some times, until process will gone to working state. I understand principial problem this lights - bad light on big polygon. It's experimental issue. -- Wbr, Yurik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
