On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:47:32 +0100 leee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it absolutely be part of flight simulation software. The main reason I > made the Canberra B(I)8 was so that I had an appropriate aircraft to > investigate LABS/toss-bombing scenarios and techniques. This wasn't because > I wanted to pretend to vapourise lots of people but because the aerial > manuevers are interesting in their own right. > > Saying that FG should be a 'civil' only flight sim is saying that certain > aerial manuevers must not be performed using it. Should I not have done an > SU-37 to show that the YASim FDM is capable of performing many of the > manuevers that the real aircraft is capable of, just because it is a military > aircraft, and should we not be allowed to investigate these technologies and > developments in FG? > > I think that trying to insist on a civil only FG seems too much like an > ineffective and misplaced form of censorship that will change nothing in the > real world, and that is really where the problem is. > > LeeE >
I dont have a problem with military aircraft,for the same reason as LeeE ,but what part of the flight dynamics does a hole in the ground effect ? Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
