I have worked previously on a KDE port of the ProController client (now
replaced by ASRC) and maybe I'm a bit bitter about my experience at that
time. Therefore I'm not trying to give answers here, but just ask some -
possibly suggestive ;-) - questions.

Holger Wirtz wrote:
> But they asked me if I want to write something like a VATSIM-proxy for
> FG to get arround the GPL problem. This proxy has to be closed-source.

Hrm, so they are interested in getting FlightGear users into the boat,
but they are not willing to open their protocol? How big can that
interest in FlightGear users be relative to the interest in keeping
their protocol obscured? Might that be some security-by-obscurity thing?


This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
Flightgear-devel mailing list

Reply via email to