-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Curtis Olson schrieb: > How about a quick, friendly, positive, informal thread here to do a poll > on what what folks are thinking for the next version number.
The odd/even numbering scheme doesn't really work for us (did anyone ever backport bugfixes to our "stable" series?) So *my* preference with the biggest continuity: 0.10.0 But I also like the idea of dropping the first zero - we kept it far too long... That'll be 10.0 then. Looking at our development process I also like the idea of an [k]ubunutu like scheme and just call it 07.12 What I don't like is avoiding 0.9.11 because of associations it might cause (at that day mass murder has happened - but terrorism is only working when we belive in it *and* react to it. Don't feed the trolls, no matter how hard it is for the victims I'm feeling very sorry for). What I like is a version number that represents the state of FGFS (or drop the thing that nobody needs and just use the current date...) CU, Christian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUJdkoWM1JLkHou0RCLVjAJ4iGIPgOmrJef7Wzv4/9QQALA3BgwCeKiqx 587h+EIEho1QNeOwgLoOBZA= =RBWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
