-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I agree, 0.9.11 or 0.9.90 may be acceptable.
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > For me the following solutions are acceptable: > > 0.9.11 ... as the logical successor > > 0.9.90 ... making clear that we are now really close to 1.0 > and that there won't be many releases until then, > if any at all (This was done in other projects as well.) > > 1.0 ... not my favorite, but viable (I'd be tempted to > call it v1.0 "daylight edition" ;-) > > > What is absurd and completely unacceptable: > > 0.9.12 > > m. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUJHAWmK6ng/aMNkRCvGnAJ9X8xXt9xVqEtXTDtv+iEDDzKlZewCcDwXL NlHF+IscpqgabJX8DsqbXfU= =jQxo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
