-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Vivian Meazza wrote: > I think that the juxtaposition of 9.11 and "Flight Simulator" would be > unfortunate, to say the least. I'm not sure how strongly I feel about that > personally, but I recognise that there are those, particularly the other > side of the pond, who do or might. Why give gratuitous and unnecessary > offence? > > On the other hand Version 1.0. But we have OSG waiting in the wings, don;t > we?. This is just a temporary release isn't it? perhaps 9.12 or something > would be more appropriate. > That means an ilogical jump. In that case 0.10.0 would be better.
/AnMaster -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUDxWWmK6ng/aMNkRCpyQAJ44QiM3gbY2hUrvbu6WJy4xKBNRbwCfWD58 so0cNjX/Zso9UHQw2/GwM8s= =d8c7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
