On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007: > > On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > > You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft > > > as working ones, for "balancing reasons"? :-} > > > > Broken ??? > > I don't understand, these aircraft are not broken. > > That was just irony. I suggested not to include the f16 because > it's broken. And you said it's wonderful and we need more JSBSim > aircraft for balancing reasons. > SNIP > Yes, the f16 is broken. I just tried it. After a few minutes > you see how the FCS is starting to misbehave. The f16 starts > pulling to the right and up, etc. That's most noticeable after > you had it parked for some minutes. It can become completely > unflyable. I don't see use ship a broken aircraft that the > authors didn't care to fix despite several bug reports. But > well, I don't decide that anyway. > > m. > About f16-3d I just tried again it, flying with it 15 minutes over the Mediterranean sea from LFTH, i did not notice the problems you have. I confirm that it is a nice Model to fly, probably easier than the real one.
Does it mean that the computer configuration is involved ? the FDM becoming crazy. Mine is 32 bits AMD Athlon 3200 with GPU Nvidia 7800GS (full screen 1800x1440 oversea i get more than 100 fps) Regards -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ << Less i work, better i go >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
