--- Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:

> On Thursday 22 November 2007 07:36, Durk Talsma
> wrote:
> > This is a quick note to everybody: I'm planning to
> build an "official"
> > FlightGear pre-release tonight. I did a full dress
> rehearsal last sunday
> > and that all seemed to work well, but I still
> needed Curt's okay for a few
> > remaining issues. In the mean time, if there are
> any *urgent* patches
> > remaining please try to get them into CVS ASAP.
> >
> > FWIW, FlightGear/PLIB is probably in a releasable
> state as it is, but given
> > the time since the last release, there may be
> riding a lot of expectancy on
> > this release, so I'd like to be a little more
> careful and to at least one
> > more pre-release -and should any problems arise- a
> second one.
> >
> 
> To follow up on this: It seems like the initial
> testing round went pretty 
> well, with mostly minor problems being reported, and
> many of them being fixed 
> already. I'm hoping to roll up the tar files for the
> release itself this 
> weekend. I'm not sure whether we'll be able to
> transfer those to the main 
> webserver instantly, as there were some problems
> recently. If not, I hope 
> that John Wojnaroski can again provide some server
> space.  In the mean time, 
> I guess we need to make a final decision on the
> version number...
> 
> Another question: we always have a limited number of
> aircraft that are in the 
> distribution, with the rest being available as
> separate downloads. We like to 
> keep the number of aircraft constant, and
> representative of the many types of 
> aircraft supported by FlightGear. Is there any
> pressing reason to swap one 
> aircraft for another one? IIRC, there have been some
> suggestions of replacing 
> the 737 by the 787. FWIW, we currently have the
> following selection of 
> aircraft (Taken from Makefile.am):
> 
>               data/Aircraft/Generic \
>                 data/Aircraft/Instruments \
>                 data/Aircraft/Instruments-3d \
>                 data/Aircraft/UIUC \
>                 data/Aircraft/737-300 \
>                 data/Aircraft/A-10 \
>                 data/Aircraft/bf109 \
>                 data/Aircraft/bo105 \
>                 data/Aircraft/c172 \
>                 data/Aircraft/c172p \
>                 data/Aircraft/c310 \
>                 data/Aircraft/c310u3a \
>                 data/Aircraft/Citation-Bravo \
>                 data/Aircraft/f16 \
>                 data/Aircraft/j3cub \
>                 data/Aircraft/Hunter \
>                 data/Aircraft/p51d \
>                 data/Aircraft/pa28-161 \
>                 data/Aircraft/Rascal \
>                 data/Aircraft/T38 \
>                 data/Aircraft/ufo \
>                 data/Aircraft/wrightFlyer1903 \
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Durk
> 
Hi,

sounds great!

There is still one suggest by me for the
win32-version:
 
adding the sim-frame-throttle-thingy (that one for
preventing too high fps) in preference.xml or other
easy way. I see some problems with people with very
good (up-todate) computers.
That's something I miss on the win32 version!

Regards
HHS


      Heute schon einen Blick in die Zukunft von E-Mails wagen? 
www.yahoo.de/mail

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to