--- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > * Heiko Schulz -- Monday 11 February 2008: > > Even with a visibility more than 30m I can't see > much impact. > > Well, 30m isn't much. No impact here, either. :-} > > > > * Stuart Buchanan -- Monday 11 February 2008: > > I'm sure you alreay know the answer : Make it a > property value in > > preferences.xml, defaulting to 10km :) > > That's a possibility. But I'd rather try to make a > guess based > on relative humidity and maybe other components of a > given METAR > message. Then we have more variability for the 9999 > case, and MP > machines still have the same weather (as long as > they are using > METAR weather and don't manually change visibility > via z/Z). This > could, of course, be coupled with a visibility-max-m > property. > > > > > Of course, the 12nm "island" may be due to an > assumption that > > the maximum visibility will be 10km, so it may not > just be case > > of replacing the constant... > > The "islang bug" has nothing to do with METAR. Not > directly, > anyway. We didn't change METAR in the fg/plib -> > fg/osg > transition. > > m. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ha ha- Melchior tries to be funny - you know what I meant- 30 miles!
But to compute the visibility from METAR sounds like a realistic way to simulate. HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html Jetzt Mails schnell in einem Vorschaufenster überfliegen. Dies und viel mehr bietet das neue Yahoo! Mail - www.yahoo.de/mail ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
