On jeu 4 septembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote: > Anders Gidenstam wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Martin Spott wrote: > > > Hmmm, I don't get a segfault here (Debian Etch/AMD64) but a 'hang on > > > startup'. > > > > Are you sure it is a hang? On my (admittedly less powerful system) FG > > needed more than 8 minutes to start. LFPN is close to Paris... :) > > I have to admit that I didn't wait too long .... indeed, I did another > test right now and it took approx. four minutes to start at LFPN - but > this is a dual Opteron with 'sufficient' memory. FlightGear occupies > one of the two CPU's while the user is waiting. > > We've been using this, exactly the same machine to demo FlightGear on > the Flight Simulation Weekend at Lelystad. I'm certain that we _did_ > demo the Paris scenery - I remember having much fun presenting to our > guests how to fly through the Tour Eiffel - and I'm quite convinced we > didn't have to wait _that_ long for a startup. > > So, one could conclude that the way how static objects are being loaded > has changed in the meantime .... but I'd prefer to leave the guessing > to other people as I just jumped into the thread by accident :-) > > Martin.
I could take off from LFPN, but coming back i got no such runway '00' at airport LFPN Fatal error: unknown runway 00 at airport:LFPN (received from FGAirport::getRunwayByIdent) -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ "J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire " ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
