Vladimir Karmisin wrote: > Eric, the only problem with ALUT - it is not a part of OpenAL, and > it doesn't have any strict specs. So nobody can guarantee it's reliability. > > In fact, I have to agree with Melchior FRANZ, about the whole OpenAL > subsystem. Since Creative abadoned the development - it's completely dead.
Creative didn't abandon OpenAL en OpenAL isn't dead. Loki went belly up leaving things in a bit of a bad shape for Linux. OpenAL-Soft partly solves that problem these days. Free ALUT solves the other half of that problem and it *does* have a formal spec. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
