gerard robin wrote: > On dimanche 16 novembre 2008, Tim Moore wrote: >> As thoughts are turning towards a release, I wanted to bring up a couple of >> things. This time we are depending on libraries -- OpenSceneGraph -- that >> are not usually built statically. They are built for dynamic linking, and ... >> > i am trying to understand the problem, do you mean that the "standard" which > is offered by OSG people doesn't suit to our usual needs. > > ./configure > ./make > That's works for me, or at least the cmake equivalent does, but we're talking about a binary release where we don't ask end users to build packages.
> Without a lot of additional parameters, we can build and use the stable > version of OSG, that is what i do, waiting for the next stable realease, > instead of permanently updating it with the last svn. > > This is simple and untersatandable to any person mainly whose the world of > development is the past (far away), like for me. > and usable to any person who is not spending full time in front of their > computer. > > I hope i misunderstand , and what you say is not an other difficulty for us. I think you misunderstood. > > Or this will be the end , at least for me, to work on the fg cvs version. > freezing it to any new stable version. Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
