James Turner wrote:
> On 31 Dec 2008, at 17:38, Martin Spott wrote:

> > Now that the release is out, my I add a little reminder to this patch
> > which was meant to add some 'cleanup' to SimGear's use of threading
> > libraries:
> >
> >  http://blaniel.free.fr/pub/flightgear/patches/ot_simgear.patch

> That patch is entirely reasonable, but Yon's is better - rather than  
> making SGAtomic use some OpenThreads primitives, it just delegates the  
> entire atomic int handling (policy and platform decisions included!)  
> to OpenThread's own atomic class.

I was aware that a part of Daniel's changes has been superseded by
Yon's patch. Nevertheless I understand that adding the 'remaining'
parts of Daniel's patch make sense for the sake of unification - 
similar Pthread-to-OpenThreads changes had been committed to FlightGear
earlier this year, see:

  
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/gitweb.pl?p=flightgear;a=commitdiff;h=655cbcbce39e4420a511749a6b2cad889c088f08;hp=cd7ee03fbf780779ae15d0372381658ac4c29402

Do/merge/leave whatever/however you like, I just wanted to make sure
Daniel's changes don't get lost.

Cheers,
        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to