On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:00:32 -0800, John wrote in message 
<49727f30.90...@mminternet.com>:

> Curtis Olson wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM, syd adams <adams....@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>So, how about it?  Who is serious about going down that
> >>road?
> >>I am , for one, which is why I dont get the apperent need to
> >>impress the general user community... I didn't think we were
> >>creating a game here... I'm currently more interested in getting
> >>the glass cockpits to behave realistically , but since I am not a
> >>RL pilot , finding accurate information isn't that easy.Theory is
> >>great , but doesn't always match RL behavior... Input is always
> >>appreciated , with facts and docs to back it up , but not the "its
> >>wrong because I say so" kind of help ... ;)
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >http://www.atcflightsim.com/index.html
> >
> >Curt.
> >  
> >
> >  
> >
> Or for that matter
> 
> http://www.lfstech.com/index.html

..or ... er ... ;o):
http://validator.w3.org/checklink?uri=http%3A//www.lfstech.com/index.html#results1
 
> Jack


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to