On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:42:30 +0100, Erik wrote in message <49783176.9020...@ehofman.com>:
> > > Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > Arnt, they are completely within their rights to add that > stipulation. You > > can bet all of the other manufacturers will have the same > > stipulations. > > That said, the <note/> section is just a reminder to anyone who wants > to make a profit by selling a 'Boeing 747' simulator or something > similar. There are no consequences for the end user or for the > FlightGear community by this statement. > > It would be interesting to know what Boeing thinks when their brand > name is listed in a long list of supported Aircraft from several > manufacturers instead. ..I can see it: ;o) "Boeing XXX : Not supported due to trademark law concerns colditz : Colditz Escape Glider ... Gimli Glider : Supported, historical fuel management event" ..and if Airbus should get too Boeing: ;o) "Hudson Glider : Supported, historical ditch event" -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel