On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:42:30 +0100, Erik wrote in message 
<49783176.9020...@ehofman.com>:

> 
> 
> Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>   > Arnt, they are completely within their rights to add that 
> stipulation. You
> > can bet all of the other manufacturers will have the same
> > stipulations.
> 
> That said, the <note/> section is just a reminder to anyone who wants
> to make a profit by selling a 'Boeing 747' simulator or something
> similar. There are no consequences for the end user or for the
> FlightGear community by this statement.
> 
> It would be interesting to know what Boeing thinks when their brand
> name is listed in a long list of supported Aircraft from several 
> manufacturers instead.

..I can see it: ;o)
"Boeing XXX    : Not supported due to trademark law concerns
colditz    :     Colditz Escape Glider
        ... 
Gimli Glider : Supported, historical fuel management event"  

..and if Airbus should get too Boeing:  ;o)
"Hudson Glider : Supported, historical ditch event"

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to