On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:42:30 +0100, Erik wrote in message
<[email protected]>:
>
>
> Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > Arnt, they are completely within their rights to add that
> stipulation. You
> > can bet all of the other manufacturers will have the same
> > stipulations.
>
> That said, the <note/> section is just a reminder to anyone who wants
> to make a profit by selling a 'Boeing 747' simulator or something
> similar. There are no consequences for the end user or for the
> FlightGear community by this statement.
>
> It would be interesting to know what Boeing thinks when their brand
> name is listed in a long list of supported Aircraft from several
> manufacturers instead.
..I can see it: ;o)
"Boeing XXX : Not supported due to trademark law concerns
colditz : Colditz Escape Glider
...
Gimli Glider : Supported, historical fuel management event"
..and if Airbus should get too Boeing: ;o)
"Hudson Glider : Supported, historical ditch event"
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel