gerard robin wrote: > I was STUPID since, i thought that the modelers were free to create > the Aircraft in order to answer to these old criteria ( best FDM, eye > candy). I noticed now that we are dependent of some constraints, we > must accept anything coming from the mind of DEVELOPPER who decide > for us , what is good or wrong for a model.
All of this is quite a bit boring, there will always be some constraints, even with the most free project. Actually the worst constraint in Flightgear is seeing people jumping on the first pretext to start a flame. And If not starting there is always someone to follow in the flame war. This thread give some (few) positive result in the wild fire (and similar features) management discussion, but aren't you able, all you guys, to take profit of potential constraints and have a nice and friendly positive discussion. Too many contributing people here act as they were bad minded children. Please stop arguing spitefully, and if you are seriously involved in wild fire problem, please organize the discussion so it don't look as this puerile mess. And a small advice: If you are not happy or upset with someone's statement, please don't jump hysteric the next second later, (nobody want to see that) instead wait for the fever to calm down and think of the better way to explain your problem in order to get the most benefit... for all. Alexis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
