On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> > With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
> > x-shift y-shift  in-range , rotation,  v-offset, .. and so on........
> >
> > That tanker feature don't gives such information  , it is missing ,
> > is it any valuable reason ?
>
> That's not exactly "missing". It's not provided on purpose.
>
> The Nasal tanker is a radar *target*. It gives enough hints for radar
> implementations (be it the (wx)radar instrument or the f-14b's radar):
> lat/lon/altitude/ktas/true-heading/bearing/elevation/range.
>
> But the tanker cannot decide whether it is in some radar's range, nor
> where it should appear on a radar screen. This depends entirely on
> the radar and is the radar's job, not the tanker's. How would the
> tanker decide whether it is "in range"? In which range?
>
> The built-in AI radar is obsolete and should be phased out.
>
> m.
>

Then, do you mean that the old "Radar Fashion" will be removed, what a pity.

It is very useful.  We could want to keep it .





-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/

J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. 
Voltaire


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to