James Turner wrote:
> - fourthly, and most importantly, I'm not doing a blanket edit - I  
> wish I could! I'm going to have to go through each aircraft, make the  
> changes, and then test that aircraft. I'm sure I'l miss some things,  
> but I still believe it's worth it to kill off the dreaded 5x  
> multiplier, and fix all the aircraft who've been assuming the range is  
> [-10..10] - or anything else.
>
> Hopefully that's clearer.
>
> James
>   
Sorry, I misunderstood you concerning the animation edits.  I will be 
glad to help with the xml edits and testing.  Getting rid of the 
spurious 5x for the glide scope and adding the clamps is a good idea and 
adding the normalized CDI and GS could make the animators job easier.  I 
will start by changing the vor.xml and vor2.xml in Instruments-3D that 
are used in the pa24 and pa28 and perhaps several other AC.

Dave P

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to