Traditionally it is MAJOR.MINOR.PATCHLEVEL, definately more than a patchlevel thing, and way more than minor, so either 1.10.x or 2.x.x if your following that standard. 1.10 feels weird, but not sure 2.x is warranted just yet. Could ditch all that and use dates ala ubuntu, making it what...like 12.9? :D
But, are we really going to try and rush the release out by years end? Nan errors still abound, sound system has lots of rough edges still, the new material system is not finished, route manager not finished, etc, etc. Even if everything could be cleaned up by then, there would be no time left for any real testing/bug fixing. Seems like a bad idea to me. Or would it be a release candidate type thing? Has development even been frozen and branched yet? cheers! --Jacob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
