On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Jacob Burbach <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not a huge fan of > rolling over into double digits though, unless you started with double > digits to begin with. For example 1.09 to 1.10 is logical to me, but > 1.9.1 to 1.10 is not, I would expect 1.9.1 to be the newer in this > case.
Lexical sorting too, which can be a nuisance in version checks or directory listings. -- Csaba/Jester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
