Just to add my own 2 cents .... while the central repository is a fine
idea , after the move to git , I lost any commit rights to my own
work, so after a time i gave up on the idea of maintaining them and
started my own repositories . I would have happily continued to
maintain/upgrade them , and I,m hoping this change might make things
easier ... but if Im now being told that my work can be changed
without any notice to me , that i have no say over my own
contributions, then I wont waste any more time here.
I do appreciate addons to my work , particularly stuff I dont/cant do
.... but saying "it's in the central repo so i can change it whether
you like or not" does dampen the spirit of contribution .
Kind of reminds me of a contract or two Ive signed in the past , and I
really hope FG isn't coming to that.
Remember when we had common courtesy here ? And we all discussed
changes openly ?
P.S. After proofreading this have decided i need sleep :)
Cheers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to