On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:53, syd adams wrote: > while the central repository is a fine > idea , after the move to git , I lost any commit rights to my own > work, so after a time i gave up on the idea of maintaining them and > started my own repositories . I would have happily continued to > maintain/upgrade them , and I,m hoping this change might make things > easier
Hmm, that's a straight technical oversight - myself or any other the admins would have added you in 10 seconds, if we'd know there was an issue. My understanding was that all people with CVS access were granted commit access after the move to Git - that was certainly the intention! This is orthogonal to your points about courtesy to authors when making changes to their aircraft, which I also agree with - I just wanted to be clear we don't confuse an administrative screw-up with a 'policy change' that never in fact happened. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
