Am 16.12.11 11:26, schrieb HB-GRAL: > Am 15.12.11 23:13, schrieb Martin Spott: >> "Vivian Meazza" wrote: >> >>> The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational >>> capability along the way. >> >> You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational >> arrestor would have been the clever solution. >> >> We're trying to simulate real-world, don't we ? Sure, we're not >> perfect but I think we're doing our best within the limits of our >> ressources. Thus, intentionally leaving an inoperational arrestor in >> place (instead of fixing it) sounds a bit odd .... >> >> Now, who would like to merge the best of both into one single model - >> before the feature freeze ? >> >> Cheers, >> Martin. >
Hi Martin Thought it is a standard distance, but ... c. A BAK-12 can be located anywhere on the runway or in the safety area depending upon the military mission requirements. I will try to provide individual distance from the end of runway in the data. Cheers, Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
