James

> Sent: 11 June 2013 13:09
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Bug 772 (Yasim on ground)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Hyde has submitted a work-around for issue 772, which you can see here:
> 
>       https://gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/1572
> 
> He'd like this merged before the freeze (actually it's a fix so it can be
merged
> afterwards, but still), I'd like to hear any opinions on if this is a bad
idea or
> good idea. Personally I'm not so affected by issue 772, but if many people
> are, the work-around seems just-about-acceptable to me.
> 
> (Obviously it would be nicer to fix Yasim for real, but let's skip that
just for a
> moment)
> 
> Does anybody feel strongly that either:
> 
>  - the bug is very bad, so that the workaround is definitely needed
(keeping
> in mind it's a long-standing bug)
>  - the work-around is very bad, for some scenario I didn't imagine myself?
> (Helicopters on the ground? But they likely benefit more from the fix?)
> 
> I'm happy to merge the change above to get some feedback, with the
> understanding that if people raise 'problems which are worse than the
> original issue' before 2.12 is final, we could revert it.
> 

I haven't noticed any particular issue with crosswinds myself, but the fix
seems to be illogical. I can't imagine what disabling wind on the ground is
going to do for take-offs. How would the transition work? Has anyone shown
that there is anything wrong with Andy's math?

I'd like to hear what Andy has to say about this one. In the meantime I
would object to this fix.

Vivian


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to