On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message <alpine.lfd.2.03.1306201018050.25...@deltasoft.com>:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote: > > > Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which > > processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark > > suite for Flightgear. > > > > It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - > > making it by no means a simple beast to manage. > > > > If this could be automated in some way it would be much easier to > > capture, and then submit, consistent data. > > > A scripted run would be an EXCELLENT tool. ..aye, and a scripted run can be set up to play all the tricks, even if it needs to run FG several times to e.g. reset the graphics, and it can be set up to finish the run by offering to upload the results automatically. :o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
