Frederic Bouvier wrote:

Quoting "Curtis L. Olson" :



EGNX runway 09 now appears as 09x.  27 is ok.




This is a side affect of the new X-Plane apt.dat format. Frederic, we
need to strip out those x's now.



What is the right value to give to fgfs ? 09 or 09x ?



FlightGear strips out the "x" when it loads the database so internally (and for the command line options) we use 09. I'm not sure why X-Plane went with 09x. I suspect their data file parser is not the most brilliant/flexible. But it's easier for us to roll our eyes and put up with that sort of thing than to maintain a different format of the same data.


Curt.

--
Curtis Olson        http://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:        2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


_______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to