Melchior > * Dave Culp -- Saturday 25 June 2005 15:50: > > It would be intuitive for the user to reset the sim and have the carrier > > scenario reset also. > > I would also feel better if we could restore its original location, NW of > KHAF. The KSFO location with the carrier driving over land was only > temporary > for people to test, but that's IMHO too ugly. Sure, many people won't find > it after that, but that's like in real life (assuming radio failure). :-) > > > diff -u -p -u -0 -r1.4 nimitz_demo.xml > --- nimitz_demo.xml 19 Mar 2005 09:56:35 -0000 1.4 > +++ nimitz_demo.xml 25 Jun 2005 14:05:36 -0000 > @@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ > - <latitude>37.63</latitude> > - <longitude>-122.34</longitude> > - <speed>10</speed> > - <heading>285</heading> > + <latitude>37.688</latitude> > + <longitude>-122.683</longitude> > + <speed>30.0</speed> > + <heading>180</heading> > > m. >
Give us a break - it's hard enough as it is. On my TODO list is to provide Nimitz with a TACAN beacon. Which is why the Hunter and Seahawk have TACAN receivers. I'm afraid I haven't the slightest idea how right now. Not to mention proper flying courses for launch and recover. Meanwhile, back at the B29. V. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
