Vivian Meazza wrote: > Melchior > > >>* Dave Culp -- Saturday 25 June 2005 15:50: >> >>>It would be intuitive for the user to reset the sim and have the carrier >>>scenario reset also. >> >>I would also feel better if we could restore its original location, NW of >>KHAF. The KSFO location with the carrier driving over land was only >>temporary >>for people to test, but that's IMHO too ugly. Sure, many people won't find >>it after that, but that's like in real life (assuming radio failure). :-) >> >> >>diff -u -p -u -0 -r1.4 nimitz_demo.xml >>--- nimitz_demo.xml 19 Mar 2005 09:56:35 -0000 1.4 >>+++ nimitz_demo.xml 25 Jun 2005 14:05:36 -0000 >>@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ >>- <latitude>37.63</latitude> >>- <longitude>-122.34</longitude> >>- <speed>10</speed> >>- <heading>285</heading> >>+ <latitude>37.688</latitude> >>+ <longitude>-122.683</longitude> >>+ <speed>30.0</speed> >>+ <heading>180</heading> >> >>m. >> > > > Give us a break - it's hard enough as it is. On my TODO list is to provide > Nimitz with a TACAN beacon. Which is why the Hunter and Seahawk have TACAN > receivers. I'm afraid I haven't the slightest idea how right now. > > Not to mention proper flying courses for launch and recover. > > Meanwhile, back at the B29. > > V. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d >
You're flying the Superfort from a carrier !? :) Josh _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
