After loading up everything available in CVS there are a lot of flyable things available to play with in many different states of completion.
 
I would suggest rather than ditching any of the current models, regardless of state, that a better organization of the existing models would be more useful.
 
I built my self a tree within the Aircraft folder.  In the Aircraft folder I leave the models I'm currently interested in using.  That way they show up in the Windows launcher and it is not cluttered with 100's of IMHO unneeded items.
 
I defined the following categories of aircraft.
 
Fantasy - Santa, UFO etc
Experimental - X-15, YF-23 etc
GA - Citation, C-182 etc
Gliders
Commercial - 737, DC-3, etc
Pre WWII  Wright Flyer, Sopwith Camel, etc
WWII - P-51, Spitfire, etc
Post WWI - B-52, F-16 etc
 
Most of the -set XML files have a Status from the author although I don;t know if there is a "standard" definition of the status's.  A standard definition would also be useful.
 
As far as the Base package I think it has a relatively small number of reasonably complete aircraft doesn't it?
 
Ray Mc
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to