On Thu 31 May 2007 16:18, Curtis Olson wrote: > On 5/31/07, AJ MacLeod wrote: > > What's more, of the aforementioned aircraft at least the Citation Bravo > > (is it > > really part of the base package?) and the Hunter work perfectly here, and > > pretty much always have. > > > > And I'm also sure that some of the a/c in > > the base package are no longer "best in class" and are hogging limelight > > that > > should be cast on some of the really excellent newer or further developed > > models that we have to show off. > > I have asked previously for people to recommend posisble changes to the > base set of aircraft included in the distribution. The one condition is if > you suggest a new airplane, you have to also suggest which aircraft it > replaces. > > It certainly makes sense to put our best foot forward with the default set > of aircraft. > > Best regards, > > Curt.
Hello Curt, That is the main problem, you probably remember i worried that not any Air Navy aircraft Carrier capable, will be there , ie: the nice SeaHawk or Seafire, but i never will not dare to ask to replace an existing one. All of these are meriting to be there, and because models are better and better it will be difficult to shoot one. :) Regards -- Gérard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
