On 5/31/07, gh.robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is the main problem, you probably remember i worried that not any Air
Navy aircraft Carrier capable, will be there , ie: the nice SeaHawk or
Seafire, but i never will not dare to ask to replace an existing one.
All of these are meriting to be there, and because models are better and
better it will be difficult to shoot one. :)
Yes, because we need to keep the total download size from exploding
exponentially, we have to make some *really hard* decisions about which
models go in and which don't. If we add a new model in, we have to remove
something else. At this point it seems easier to maintain the status quo,
but I am certainly open to good suggestions.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson - University of Minnesota - FlightGear Project
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
