Hi Curt,

Curtis Olson schrieb am 31.05.2007 16:55:
>
> Yes, because we need to keep the total download size from exploding 
> exponentially, we have to make some *really hard* decisions about 
> which models go in and which don't.  If we add a new model in, we have 
> to remove something else.  At this point it seems easier to maintain 
> the status quo, but I am certainly open to good suggestions.
>
> Curt.
I agree that we need to limit the download size. But on the other hand, 
we should cover with the base package all features of flightgear. And as 
the number of features in flightgear is increasing, we should discuss to 
increase the number of included aircrafts, E. g. since the capability of 
simulate helicopter we have the bo105 in the base package. The 
capability of carrier landings is a very great feature, and therefore I 
vote for adding a carrier capable aircraft (as well as a seaplane (if 
syd get the animation fixed))

Best regards,
Maik

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
Flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users

Reply via email to