Duncan Gibson wrote: > STR #2149: Add a Makefile example for multi-module build using fltk-config > involved adding a small amount of text to basics.dox and committing it. > However fltk.pdf, also under subversion, was regenerated in the process, > but I did not commit this as I think that adding 5Mb for small changes is > a bit excessive. I assume that this will only be commited before releases. > > Was this discussed before? If so, what was the outcome?
AFAICT there was no real discussion/decision about this. The current habit was to generate the docs (pdf + html) from time to time and commit the pdf to svn after greater changes only. I think that we should keep that, because someone complained that the big fltk.pdf file would be updated everytime when he rolled his svn working copy back and forward for test reasons. But there is more to do: The pdf _and_ html versions should also be committed to the web site from time to time. IIRC, the only one who did this until now was Fabien, who has the most recent doxygen and LaTeX versions installed. My versions are older, and I can't create the pdf file correctly (and there are also some diffs in the html docs). But if you have working new versions ... BTW.: I'm not keen on having the pdf file in the source distribution at all, but we discussed this already, and until we have a better solution, this is okay for me. For the release version I can imagine that we would better have a separate fltk-docs package (with pdf and html docs). Just my 2 ct. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
