>>> Hmm. I noticed that the current 1.3.x html links are not working a >>> few days ago, but I've never investigated how to keep them up to >>> date...
> Well, I did update the html and pdf version on the website recently, > that said ; I did not update the pdf file on the source repos, > because some complained about the size of the pdf when they update > their svn local copy, as Al already mentioned. I've just checked, and now have links again, so you must have updated them in the meantime. > Concerning the documentation 'with comments' link, > I did not dive into it yet,because it probably needs some database > modification/update to grab the comments related to the 1.3 doc, > but I may be wrong. Well implementing the "with comments" would be good, but would mean that someone needs to monitor the comments to see whether to apply them. And Greg is doing a good job raising documentation STRs. LOL. > Duncan, I noticed you have not finished your hmtl doc modifications, > so I'll probably update the WWW (html+pdf) at the end of the week. I'm just fiddling about really, trying to get rid of the easier to fix STRs and bring the bug count down. I hadn't looked at the docs since before you did the big reorganization. I was waiting for the dust to settle and ran out of spare time to work. I had forgotten how much there is still to do on the documentation, removing html in favour of doxygen, etc. So I might end up fiddling for a while longer yet. I have a bit of spare time again... To be pragmatic, I would say that we don't need to update the 1.3.x html pages on the web for every minor typo correction. We should probably not aim for anything more regular than monthly. The fltk.pdf version can probably wait for three to six months, or the next release, whichever comes first. Cheers Duncan _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
