Fabien Costantini wrote:
>> Mike (or someone), can you add me to svn?
> If it's not done already, just fill the application form on the website,
> I'm sure you'll get an answer rapidly ;-)
Ah, thanks -- didn't know that was there.
I see there's a "Request Developer Status" under 'My Account'.. cool.
>
>> Duncan, if you want, I can join the dox effort.
> As the doxygen dox 1.3 initiator, I'd also welcome your efforts in that field.
Great; sorry, guess I forgot all the folks involved in the dox push..
quite a Herculean effort, I'm sure..!
>> If you're still in the initial stages of working out the
>> dox style, I can hold off, or avoid certain parts you're
>> still working on. We can synchronize by email.
>> Not sure I understand what you mean here, but I would prefer
>> that you harmonize with existing dox style first which is no looking
>> bad imho. Then any suggestions are welcome to improve it of course.
Will do.
Wasn't sure if the dox strategy had been stabilized.
>> I'd also be happy to start or assist in the creation of an
>> FLTK doxygen "standards" page that describes how docs should
>> appear, so that new docs follow a certain format.
Great; I'll see if I can give it a start.
When/if I do, I'll follow up here in fltk.development.
I'll just hit the commenting style stuff based on what I see,
then you guys can flesh it out/correct me, as there's probably
details re: latex/tex gen that I know nothing about.
Regarding actual FLTK doc tweaking, I expect I'll only be
enhancing what's already in place.. I take it you all did the
heavy lifting of converting the old html over to dox.
_______________________________________________
fltk-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
