On 11.01.2011 17:32, Michael Sweet wrote: >>> Otherwise, hiding Fl_X for the mac is probably an oversight >>> and should be fixed. >> >> One for Manolo I guess. Though... There is the bigger question of >> whether Fl_X should be exposed or not. >> >> What do folk think? > > > +1 for making the Fl_X class private (and not API for developers...)
I voted for hiding as well, and Manolo did it recently for X11, but now I found out that we *have* some documentation for Fl_X in the chapter "Operating System Issues", section "Using a Subclass of Fl_Window for Special X Stuff". This is X11 only, and I guess only hardcore X11 developers can understand and use all of it ;-) So, what to do now? Revert? Rewrite/remove this documentation chapter? What about those who used this information in their programs? Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
