On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > On 11.01.2011 17:32, Michael Sweet wrote: > >>>> Otherwise, hiding Fl_X for the mac is probably an oversight >>>> and should be fixed. >>> >>> One for Manolo I guess. Though... There is the bigger question of >>> whether Fl_X should be exposed or not. >>> >>> What do folk think? >> >> >> +1 for making the Fl_X class private (and not API for developers...) > > I voted for hiding as well, and Manolo did it recently for X11, but > now I found out that we *have* some documentation for Fl_X in the > chapter "Operating System Issues", section "Using a Subclass of > Fl_Window for Special X Stuff". This is X11 only, and I guess only > hardcore X11 developers can understand and use all of it ;-) > > So, what to do now? Revert? Rewrite/remove this documentation chapter? > What about those who used this information in their programs?
Document the workaround (define FL_LIBRARY) and note that such code will likely not be portable to future versions of FLTK. ________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
