Greg Ercolano wrote: > matthiasm wrote: >> On 28.03.2008, at 19:50, Greg Ercolano wrote: >>> I just did a quick check of the STRs using the search feature. >>> I found by setting "Status: Unresolved" and STRs/Page to 100 >>> I could easily view all the unresolved STRs -- there's 408 of them. >>> >>> I can probably write a little script that grabs them all up into >>> a big ascii file, and we can split(1) it into pieces to go trawling >>> for the ABI oriented stuff. Would that help? >> >> Yes, that is a great idea! > > Here's all 408 'Unresolved' STR's to date (aka. "Closed without > Resolution"): > I concatenated them all into one big ole html file sorted by STR#, > lowest to highest: > > > http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/tmp/strs-03-31-08-close-wout-resolution.html > > I suppose we can each grab an STR# range and go sniffing for > which STRs might be relevant. > > How many sniffers want to volunteer? > > Once we have a few, I'll evenly assign start/end ranges of STR#s > to each of you, and we can each build a list of relevant STR numbers. > > Mike: are there any other modes besides "Closed without Resolution" > that ABI related STRs might be closed as? From where I sit, I'm not > sure I know all the states a closed STR can be in.
No, we either close with resolution or without. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
