Greg Ercolano wrote: > Here's all 408 'Unresolved' STR's to date (aka. "Closed without > Resolution"): > I concatenated them all into one big ole html file sorted by STR#, > lowest to highest: > > > http://seriss.com/people/erco/fltk/tmp/strs-03-31-08-close-wout-resolution.html
Very good, sorted by STR# is fine. I don't know how much work this has been - would it be possible for you to do the same with all *open* FLTK 1.2 STRs ? http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L+M1000+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+Q1.2 > I suppose we can each grab an STR# range and go sniffing for > which STRs might be relevant. > > How many sniffers want to volunteer? I'll be one of them. > Once we have a few, I'll evenly assign start/end ranges of STR#s > to each of you, and we can each build a list of relevant STR numbers. I'd like to take 50 STRs and see what I can do. I'd suggest that others would also take a certain number of STRs, so that we can start working, as we like. If there are still STRs to check, when someone is done with her/his list, then s/he could take another 50 STRs. Gimme a range of 50 STRs, and I'll start working ... _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
