Duncan Gibson wrote: >> I find that there is no big difference between 1.3.x and 1.4. >> So why did you update FLTK from 1.3 to 1.4 instead of 1.3.x? >> Is version 1.4 compatible with version 1.3? > > It's just a trick to mean "a 1.3.x release after 1.3.0". There > isn't really a 1.4 in the planning just yet. There was a sudden > influx of bug reports and feature requests (STRs and RFEs) for > 1.3.x and that made it hard to see what really needed to be done > for the 1.3.0 release. So 1.4 was invented, and all STRs and > RFEs that won't be addressed immediately for the 1.3.0 release > were moved there so that they didn't get forgotten. > > No doubt when 1.3.0 is finally released, someone will create a > 1.3.1 target, and some of the most important 1.4 STRs and RDEs > will be moved back to 1.3.1 to give a meaningful target to aim > for. And so on when 1.3.1 is released. > > How do you eat an elephant? One burger at a time. > > D.
You mean that 1.4 will finally become 1.3.1 or 1.3.2? _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
