> FLTK 1 over the years has become a nice starting point for the first > steps in GUI programming. It runs on al major platform (and on many > minor ones as well), is small, compact, and easy to use. FLTK 2 was > the attempt to continue the success of FLTK 1 with a much cleaber API > and many important details improved. Unfortunately many users never > made the jump to FLTK 2 and so it not only ended in a crawling slow > branch, it also became instable and at last unmaintainable. > > I would like to spend some of my spare time to create FLTK 3.
I'm absolutely amazed by the initial results shown in the new Poll: [currently 1.0.x: 2%, 1.1.x: 40%, 1.3.x: 18%, 2.x: 37%, 3.x: 15% !] Which version of FLTK do you use actively? http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r25 >From the forum postings, I would never have believed that there was such a high proportion of active FLTK2 users. But it is the high proportion of people _actively_ using FLTK3 when Matt only put forward the idea less than two weeks ago! [I wonder whether FLTK3 should have been included as an option] Let's hope that the proportions stabilize to something more believably representative as more people provide their input. Cheers Duncan _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
