On 10/10/2009 7:05 PM, Duncan Gibson wrote: >> FLTK 1 over the years has become a nice starting point for the first >> steps in GUI programming. It runs on al major platform (and on many >> minor ones as well), is small, compact, and easy to use. FLTK 2 was >> the attempt to continue the success of FLTK 1 with a much cleaber API >> and many important details improved. Unfortunately many users never >> made the jump to FLTK 2 and so it not only ended in a crawling slow >> branch, it also became instable and at last unmaintainable. >> >> I would like to spend some of my spare time to create FLTK 3. > > > I'm absolutely amazed by the initial results shown in the new Poll: > [currently 1.0.x: 2%, 1.1.x: 40%, 1.3.x: 18%, 2.x: 37%, 3.x: 15% !] > Which version of FLTK do you use actively? > http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r25 > > From the forum postings, I would never have believed that there > was such a high proportion of active FLTK2 users. > > But it is the high proportion of people _actively_ using FLTK3 > when Matt only put forward the idea less than two weeks ago! > [I wonder whether FLTK3 should have been included as an option] > > Let's hope that the proportions stabilize to something more > believably representative as more people provide their input. > > Cheers > Duncan
You are right thinking this way, but you also have to count how many abandon Fltk, seen the mess that is in. Fltk2 is on the list from LAST CENTURY. And you have 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and now 3.0 version all running at the same time. At least Matthias can see that, and trying to do something. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
