On 11.10.2009, at 00:32, Mike Tsakiris wrote: >> >> I'm absolutely amazed by the initial results shown in the new Poll: >> [currently 1.0.x: 2%, 1.1.x: 40%, 1.3.x: 18%, 2.x: 37%, 3.x: 15% !] >> Which version of FLTK do you use actively? >> http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r25 >> >> From the forum postings, I would never have believed that there >> was such a high proportion of active FLTK2 users. >> >> But it is the high proportion of people _actively_ using FLTK3 >> when Matt only put forward the idea less than two weeks ago! >> [I wonder whether FLTK3 should have been included as an option] >> >> Let's hope that the proportions stabilize to something more >> believably representative as more people provide their input.
Yeah, what an interesting result. I expected a lot less FLTK2 users, and I was hoping for a larger number of overall users (but honestly, I should not be surprised). > You are right thinking this way, but you also have to count how many > abandon Fltk, seen the mess that is in. Fltk2 is on the list from LAST > CENTURY. And you have 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, and now 3.0 version all running > at > the same time. Well, we will have to consolidate all that into one easy to understand stream of events with a clear recommendation for new users. Thanks, Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
