Great, I'll try to hold off until then ;) So far then that's everyone in favour of just supporting 2.1GA.
Plan is currently: 1. Branch/tag the current trunk as 2.0.1GA 2. Update trunk to use 2.1GA 3. Continue development on trunk That means the 2.0.1GA is effectively frozen. We'd might do major bugfixes into it, but definitely no new features. Yay or nay? On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, but not before my holiday which starts tomorrow afternoon :) So > it's fine with me when you drop the support :) > > On Jul 20, 2:00 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you planning on upgrading to 2.1? > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I understand, but I want to run a new version of course ;) > > > > > On Jul 20, 1:44 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Your setup isn't an issue then David, because if you're already > running > > > on a > > > > very old version then you won't be affected by us upgrading ;) > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:37 PM, David Perfors <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I am still using 2.0.1GA just because I didn't had time to switch > to > > > > > 2.1GA. Is there already fluent configuration for Dynamic Proxies? > > > > > > > I also running a very old version of FNH because I don't seem to > get > > > > > SubClasses work properly... > > > > > > > On Jul 20, 12:38 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > That would be me :) > > > > > > I'm aiming for the beginning of August for 1.0, but as for 2.1GA > > > support > > > > > > that will probably go into trunk in the next few days (depending > on > > > the > > > > > > feedback here). > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mikael Henriksson < > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Speaking of which. How far away is the 2.1GA supported release? > Are > > > we > > > > > > > talking about FNH 1.0 release? You sure have been working your > > > asses > > > > > off > > > > > > > lately. Saw something about a 16h FNH day on twitter. > > > > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Greg Cook <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > My vote is to dump the support for 2.0.1! I don't think it > should > > > take > > > > > > >> anyone long to get their mappings up to par with 2.1GA > > > > > > >> I have 3 very large projects now that I'll be upgrading to > 2.1GA > > > and I > > > > > > >> don't expect it to take long.... > > > > > > > > >> Greg > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mikael Henriksson < > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Drop the support for 2.0.1GA! > > > > > > > > >>> 2009/7/19 James Gregory <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >>>> haha good good > > > > > > > > >>>> Just to clarify, 1.0 will be 2.1GA I've just not decided on > > > what's > > > > > going to happen to 2.0.1GA support. Ideally I'd just stop > supporting > > > it, but > > > > > I'd like to know if that's a problem for anyone. > > > > > > > > >>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, David R. Longnecker < > > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>>> +1 to 2.1GA. Heh, was sitting updating the src files I had > for > > > the > > > > > new > > > > > > >>>>> Oracle dialect changes. > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
