+1 for moving to 2.1GA
On Jul 20, 8:06 am, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> Great, I'll try to hold off until then ;)
> So far then that's everyone in favour of just supporting 2.1GA.
>
> Plan is currently:
>
> 1. Branch/tag the current trunk as 2.0.1GA
> 2. Update trunk to use 2.1GA
> 3. Continue development on trunk
>
> That means the 2.0.1GA is effectively frozen. We'd might do major bugfixes
> into it, but definitely no new features.
>
> Yay or nay?
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, but not before my holiday which starts tomorrow afternoon :) So
> > it's fine with me when you drop the support :)
>
> > On Jul 20, 2:00 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Are you planning on upgrading to 2.1?
>
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > I understand, but I want to run a new version of course ;)
>
> > > > On Jul 20, 1:44 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Your setup isn't an issue then David, because if you're already
> > running
> > > > on a
> > > > > very old version then you won't be affected by us upgrading ;)
>
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:37 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I am still using 2.0.1GA just because I didn't had time to switch
> > to
> > > > > > 2.1GA. Is there already fluent configuration for Dynamic Proxies?
>
> > > > > > I also running a very old version of FNH because I don't seem to
> > get
> > > > > > SubClasses work properly...
>
> > > > > > On Jul 20, 12:38 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > That would be me :)
> > > > > > > I'm aiming for the beginning of August for 1.0, but as for 2.1GA
> > > > support
> > > > > > > that will probably go into trunk in the next few days (depending
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > feedback here).
>
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mikael Henriksson <
> > > > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Speaking of which. How far away is the 2.1GA supported release?
> > Are
> > > > we
> > > > > > > > talking about FNH 1.0 release? You sure have been working your
> > > > asses
> > > > > > off
> > > > > > > > lately. Saw something about a 16h FNH day on twitter.
>
> > > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Greg Cook <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > > My vote is to dump the support for 2.0.1! I don't think it
> > should
> > > > take
> > > > > > > >> anyone long to get their mappings up to par with 2.1GA
> > > > > > > >> I have 3 very large projects now that I'll be upgrading to
> > 2.1GA
> > > > and I
> > > > > > > >> don't expect it to take long....
>
> > > > > > > >> Greg
>
> > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mikael Henriksson <
> > > > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>> Drop the support for 2.0.1GA!
>
> > > > > > > >>> 2009/7/19 James Gregory <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > >>>> haha good good
>
> > > > > > > >>>> Just to clarify, 1.0 will be 2.1GA I've just not decided on
> > > > what's
> > > > > > going to happen to 2.0.1GA support. Ideally I'd just stop
> > supporting
> > > > it, but
> > > > > > I'd like to know if that's a problem for anyone.
>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, David R. Longnecker <
> > > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>>>> +1 to 2.1GA. Heh, was sitting updating the src files I had
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > >>>>> Oracle dialect changes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
