+1 for dropping support for 2.0.1.

2009/7/20 Mikael Henriksson <[email protected]>

> YAY!! :)
>
> 2009/7/20 James Gregory <[email protected]>
>
> Great, I'll try to hold off until then ;)
>> So far then that's everyone in favour of just supporting 2.1GA.
>>
>> Plan is currently:
>>
>>    1. Branch/tag the current trunk as 2.0.1GA
>>    2. Update trunk to use 2.1GA
>>    3. Continue development on trunk
>>
>> That means the 2.0.1GA is effectively frozen. We'd might do major bugfixes
>> into it, but definitely no new features.
>>
>> Yay or nay?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, but not before my holiday which starts tomorrow afternoon :) So
>>> it's fine with me when you drop the support :)
>>>
>>> On Jul 20, 2:00 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Are you planning on upgrading to 2.1?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I understand, but I want to run a new version of course ;)
>>> >
>>> > > On Jul 20, 1:44 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > Your setup isn't an issue then David, because if you're already
>>> running
>>> > > on a
>>> > > > very old version then you won't be affected by us upgrading ;)
>>> >
>>> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:37 PM, David Perfors <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > I am still using 2.0.1GA just because I didn't had time to switch
>>> to
>>> > > > > 2.1GA. Is there already fluent configuration for Dynamic Proxies?
>>> >
>>> > > > > I also running a very old version of FNH because I don't seem to
>>> get
>>> > > > > SubClasses work properly...
>>> >
>>> > > > > On Jul 20, 12:38 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > That would be me :)
>>> > > > > > I'm aiming for the beginning of August for 1.0, but as for
>>> 2.1GA
>>> > > support
>>> > > > > > that will probably go into trunk in the next few days
>>> (depending on
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > > feedback here).
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mikael Henriksson <
>>> > > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Speaking of which. How far away is the 2.1GA supported
>>> release? Are
>>> > > we
>>> > > > > > > talking about FNH 1.0 release? You sure have been working
>>> your
>>> > > asses
>>> > > > > off
>>> > > > > > > lately. Saw something about a 16h FNH day on twitter.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Greg Cook <[email protected]>
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > My vote is to dump the support for 2.0.1!  I don't think it
>>> should
>>> > > take
>>> > > > > > >> anyone long to get their mappings up to par with 2.1GA
>>> > > > > > >> I have 3 very large projects now that I'll be upgrading to
>>> 2.1GA
>>> > > and I
>>> > > > > > >> don't expect it to take long....
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >> Greg
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mikael Henriksson <
>>> > > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>> Drop the support for 2.0.1GA!
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>> 2009/7/19 James Gregory <[email protected]>
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>> haha good good
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>> Just to clarify, 1.0 will be 2.1GA I've just not decided
>>> on
>>> > > what's
>>> > > > > going to happen to 2.0.1GA support. Ideally I'd just stop
>>> supporting
>>> > > it, but
>>> > > > > I'd like to know if that's a problem for anyone.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, David R. Longnecker <
>>> > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > >>>>> +1 to 2.1GA.  Heh, was sitting updating the src files I
>>> had for
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > new
>>> > > > > > >>>>> Oracle dialect changes.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to