Sounds good. :) On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:06 AM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:
> Great, I'll try to hold off until then ;) > So far then that's everyone in favour of just supporting 2.1GA. > > Plan is currently: > > 1. Branch/tag the current trunk as 2.0.1GA > 2. Update trunk to use 2.1GA > 3. Continue development on trunk > > That means the 2.0.1GA is effectively frozen. We'd might do major bugfixes > into it, but definitely no new features. > > Yay or nay? > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Yes, but not before my holiday which starts tomorrow afternoon :) So >> it's fine with me when you drop the support :) >> >> On Jul 20, 2:00 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Are you planning on upgrading to 2.1? >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Perfors <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I understand, but I want to run a new version of course ;) >> > >> > > On Jul 20, 1:44 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Your setup isn't an issue then David, because if you're already >> running >> > > on a >> > > > very old version then you won't be affected by us upgrading ;) >> > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:37 PM, David Perfors < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > > I am still using 2.0.1GA just because I didn't had time to switch >> to >> > > > > 2.1GA. Is there already fluent configuration for Dynamic Proxies? >> > >> > > > > I also running a very old version of FNH because I don't seem to >> get >> > > > > SubClasses work properly... >> > >> > > > > On Jul 20, 12:38 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > That would be me :) >> > > > > > I'm aiming for the beginning of August for 1.0, but as for 2.1GA >> > > support >> > > > > > that will probably go into trunk in the next few days (depending >> on >> > > the >> > > > > > feedback here). >> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mikael Henriksson < >> > > > > [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > Speaking of which. How far away is the 2.1GA supported >> release? Are >> > > we >> > > > > > > talking about FNH 1.0 release? You sure have been working your >> > > asses >> > > > > off >> > > > > > > lately. Saw something about a 16h FNH day on twitter. >> > >> > > > > > > 2009/7/20 Greg Cook <[email protected]> >> > >> > > > > > > My vote is to dump the support for 2.0.1! I don't think it >> should >> > > take >> > > > > > >> anyone long to get their mappings up to par with 2.1GA >> > > > > > >> I have 3 very large projects now that I'll be upgrading to >> 2.1GA >> > > and I >> > > > > > >> don't expect it to take long.... >> > >> > > > > > >> Greg >> > >> > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mikael Henriksson < >> > > > > [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >>> Drop the support for 2.0.1GA! >> > >> > > > > > >>> 2009/7/19 James Gregory <[email protected]> >> > >> > > > > > >>>> haha good good >> > >> > > > > > >>>> Just to clarify, 1.0 will be 2.1GA I've just not decided on >> > > what's >> > > > > going to happen to 2.0.1GA support. Ideally I'd just stop >> supporting >> > > it, but >> > > > > I'd like to know if that's a problem for anyone. >> > >> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, David R. Longnecker < >> > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >>>>> +1 to 2.1GA. Heh, was sitting updating the src files I >> had for >> > > the >> > > > > new >> > > > > > >>>>> Oracle dialect changes. >> > >> > >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
